in the old burying ground
Even in midafternoon, the sunlight falls unevenly on the old burying ground, settling on a few of the gravestones, but leaving many more in shadow. Some of the gravestones have sunken so far into the ground that only the first line of writing is visible. Some have fallen over and some are so worn that the names and dates can no longer be made out. There are gravestones topped with winged skulls, with urns and willows, with spirals, with stars, with cherubs. There are smaller stones for babies and children and gravestones with double, or even triple, semi-circular crests, where the deaths of two or three family members -- usually children -- came close enough together that that they could share a single grave. Some of the carvings are elaborate and skillfully rendered; some are rough and hesitant, as though the carver wasn't sure how to hold the chisel or what he meant to write. Some inscriptions have a caret at the end of a line pointing to a letter inserted above, where someone miscalculated the available space and there wasn't enough time or money to start over.
Ammi Cutter has a tall, solid gravestone, flanked by those of two of his children and two of his wives. When he died, at the age of 62, he left "17 living children and 46 grandchildren." William Clark and his wife, Hannah Clark, both died young, but their 20-year-old son, John, died before either of his parents and lies buried between them. There's John Hill, who was "kill'd by a Cart," and Mary Russell, the fifth daughter of Joseph and Mary Russell, who died unmarried at 56, and David Robbins who died on October 24, 1736, "aged one day." Three deeply-cut faces, two in profile, and one, slightly cross-eyed, staring straight ahead, mark the grave of three brothers, William, Jonas, and Jonathan Adams, ages 7, 2, and 6 months, who all died on the same day in April 1792. What happened to them? Sickness? Fire? A long-ago murder? Did their parents feel sorrow or anger or resignation? The gravestone is silent. In the back, off to one side, is a gravestone inscribed "In memory of two twins of Mr. George and Mrs. Lydia Prentice." The twins, Zachariah and Rebecca, died in November 1782 and lined up beside them are their siblings, Sarah, John, and Benjamin, all of whom were buried before reaching their first birthday.
I work my way from one crooked row to the next, examining the names and dates, occasionally bending down to brush off dirt or pull up grass. The gravestones serve their purpose and, more than 200 years later, a stranger walking among them can read the stories etched into the thin grey slate. You are not forgotten, I tell them. Though you are dead and and everyone who mourned for you is dead and the man who carved your epitaph is dead, I know that once you lived and breathed. I know your name. You are not forgotten. It's all I can do for them.
22 comments:
I love to wander through old graveyards. The older, the better.
Lovely post.
no life is truly forgotten.
it's awfully kind of you to think of or consider those old lives.
hopefully the universe will reward you aptly.
When I wander through 18th century graveyards, I always wonder where the bones really are, since if there are rows of graves, it means people interested in the park movements of the 19th century moved them. Sorry for my irreverent thoughts - I am also moved by thinking of losses so long past but I can't think of the space without how it came to be.
Sara -- It would be even better (strictly from a metaphorical point of view) if the people weren't really there at all. Is there a way to tell? They are sort of arranged in rough rows, but with gaps and with many stones just standing all alone. Maybe the theory was that the spaces would be filled in later. I guess I could look into the history of that particular cemetary...
What could have been is sometimes sadder to realize that what actually was.
I love the time I spend walking through the rows of our old cemetery. Though it only dates to the late 1800s, it still carries the same sense of history for me. And the beautiful lives that the markers represent never fails to move me. I sometimes feel more at home walking the rows of the cemetery than I feel anywhere else.
One of my favorite places is Westminster Abby; I walk like a ghost among the chatty tourists, looking at the ground. There are people buried in every corner of the abby - my favorite, if you can call it that, is a small stone marking the resting place of a knight who was "murdered in the choir."
when i was a little girl, i used to go the cemetery with my grandmother, so she could plant & water the flowers on the family graves. i was fascinated by the children's graves, with little lambs on them, and by the way the materials of the graves changed over time...slate to some crumbly white stone to something black to granite. only the oldest slate ones and the newest granite ones were legible.
to me, they say "i was here." and i love, still, to walk among them, trying to honour those whose stories they tell. my mum and i took O to the cemetery this weekend, to plant flowers for my now-gone grandmother, and i walked him around, showing him the old stones, telling him the names. telling him the childrens' names especially. i am not sure why i was compelled to do that...especially when his own brother doesn't have a stone, is not buried anywhere.
go figure.
Sara, Niobe,
Someone is actually in charge with moving the bones and all the surrounding earth when a graveyard is moved. All the earth near and below must be moved, since no one can tell what has disintegrated and what is still there. And the reinternment is done with respect as well.
Some places, like scattering areas for cremation can never be moved, ever. At least here, if it's a registered or known graveyard, someone must take care of it, and the stones and the grounds.
I'm kind of relieved about that. It's the only way I could entrust my children to them. I hopethat far in the future someone is caring about them emotionally to, not just me.
I love being in cemeteries. Our local Target overlooks a cemetery (yeah, I know!) but it is so oddly mesmerizing.
This was a nice post.
Beautiful. Reading this makes me wonder yet again if we have made the right choice in not burying our twins. Maybe there really would be some comfort in knowing their names would be seen and read by generations to come. I don't know...
I agree with Lori. I think this post is beautiful. I also am now thinking of not burying my daughter, but getting her a headstone or plaque in a cemetery.
Sorry, Aurelia, that may be true today in commercial cemeteries but was not in the past. Perhaps some graves were exhumed for the renovations 19th century people felt were necessary, but as a general rule the graves were left alone and the caretakers and landscapers just made an effort to keep them in the same area of the burial ground.
I agree that I'm glad such an action would be much more difficult today.
I often think about the infant mortality rates from those times and how I would have fit in there so much more than I do here. I don't have grave markers for my twins, but we are planning to do it. I think part of wanting to do that, is that they will not be forgotten (at least not by us). And maybe strangers will know they were here too? There's some comfort in that.
I find an odd sense of peace and tranquility when I walk through a cemetary. This is such a beautiful post.
thank you niobe, for such a beautiful and thoughtful post. i hope that when we are long gone, a kind stranger will dust off our marker and wonder about our twins too.
over easter i saw a marker for a baby who died in 1940, and thought of how his parents probably never forgot him.
Sara, I know this is an area of study for you, so I'm crying uncle in regards to past practices.
As for today, yes, it would not just be more difficult, it would be illegal due to property & internment rights. I just don't want anyone reading this thread to think that someday their child's remains and marker would separated.
I couldn't comment this morning-- too much swirling in my mind.
I live near at least four graveyards, one literally next to my street, and have never gone inside. I walk the cemetery where my grandfather is buried, and I walk A's little corner of the cemetery obsessively, every time. And, of course, the one in the Old City.
Maybe the difference is that I don't think I had actually been to one before my grandfather's funeral (except maybe on a tour of a historic one sometime). There was a superstition in The Old Country about letting kids go to the cemeteries, in that you shouldn't. Now that I think of it, must have trans-something-or-other of the kaddish rules.
This is a beautiful post.
I think walking through a graveyard with kids or alone is a good practice for many of the reasons mentioned in your post niobe. I remember while in Ireland walking through old churchyards where graves were hundreds of years old and then seeing mounds with no gravestones of people buried in mass when the famine existed. There is a need to remember, to not forget those who have gone before. Hopefully it brings additional meaning to those who are living today as well.
You're right, Aurelia. It would be horrible to think of someone moving our babies' stones around. The image of people in the future caring for our places of internment is so touching.
I often wonder if it makes me sick that I like to walk in the quiet of an old cemetary. Reading stones, wondering about their stories...mourning for those lost so long ago that no one is left to mourn for them. There is something ver cathartic about it for me.
mb: I share your feelings completely. I've always loved old cemetaries.
Post a Comment